Multispectral optoacoustic tomography of the human breast: characterisation of healthy tissue and malignant lesions using a hybrid ultrasound-optoacoustic approach.
A. Becker, M. Masthoff, J. Claussen, S.J. Ford, W. Roll, M. Burg, P.J. Barth, W. Heindel, M. Schäfers, M. Eisenblätter, M. Wildgruber
Eur Radiol. 2018 Feb;28(2):602-609. doi: 10.1007/s00330-017-5002-x. Epub 2017 Aug 7
Digital mammography screening: sensitivity of the programme dependent on breast density
S. Weigel, W. Heindel, J. Heidrich, H.W. Hense, O. Heidinger
European Radiology, July 2017, Volume 27, Issue 7, pp 2744–2751 doi: 10.1007/s00330-016-4636-4
Digital Mammography Screening: Does Age Influence the Detection Rates of Low-, Intermediate-, and High-Grade Ductal Carcinoma in Situ?
S. Weigel, H. W. Hense, J. Heidrich, S. Berkemeyer, W. Heindel, O. Heidinger
Radiology, 2016 Mar;278:707–713. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2015150322
Reduction of Advanced Breast Cancer Stages at Subsequent Participation in Mammography Screening
S. Weigel, W. Heindel, J. Heidrich, O. Heidinger, H. W. Hense
Rofo. 2015; doi: 10.1055/s-0041-107835
Digital Mammography Screening with Photon-counting Technique: Can a High Diagnostic Performance Be Realized at Low Mean Glandular Dose?
S. Weigel, S. Berkemeyer, R. Girnus, A. Sommer, H. Lenzen, W. Heindel
Radiology. 2014 May;271(2):345-55. doi: 10.1148/radiol.13131181. Epub 2014 Feb 4.
Relationship between Detector Size and the Need for Extra Images and their Effect on Radiation Exposure in Digital Mammography Screening
K. Entz, A. Sommer, W. Heindel, H. Lenzen
Rofo. 2014; doi: 10.1055/s-0033-1356429