Time trend in programme sensitivity within the German mammography screening programme in North Rhine-Westphalia and Lower Saxony
B. Bokhof, L. Khil, I. Urbschat, L. Gnas, G. Hecht, O. Heidinger, W. Heindel, J. Kieschke, S. Weigel, H.W. Hense
Bundesgesundheitsbl (2018) 61: 1517. doi: 10.1007/s00103-018-2843-7
Higher Detection Rates of Biologically Aggressive Breast Cancers in Mammography Screening than in the Biennial Interval
A. Prange, B. Bokhof, P. Polzer, J. Tio, I. Radke, O. Heidinger, W. Heindel, S. Weigel
Rofo. 2018; 190. doi: 10.1055/a-0657-3970
Evaluation of the New DIN Standard for Quality Assurance of Diagnostic Displays – Technical Review DIN 6868-157
K. Entz, A. Sommer, H. Lenzen
Fortschr Röntgenstr 2018; 190(01): 51-60; DOI: 10.1055/s-0043-110862
Digital breast tomosynthesis plus synthesised images versus standard full-field digital mammography in population-based screening (TOSYMA): protocol of a randomised controlled trial
S. Weigel, J. Gerss, H.W. Hense, M. Krischke, A. Sommer, J. Czwoydzinski, H. Lenzen, L. Kerschke, K. Spieker, S. Dickmaenken, S. Baier, M. Urban, G. Hecht, O. Heidinger, J. Kieschke, W. Heindel
BMJ Open. 2018 May 14;8(5):e020475. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-020475.
Detection Rates of Ductal Carcinoma in Situ with Biennial Digital Mammography Screening: Radiologic Findings Support Pathologic Model of Tumor Progression.
S. Weigel, L. Khil, H.W. Hense, T. Decker, J. Wellmann, J. Heidrich, A. Sommer, O. Heidinger, W. Heindel
Radiology. 2018 Feb;286(2):424-432. Epub 2017 Nov 6. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2017170673
Brustkrebsfrüherkennung durch Mammographiescreening Qualitätssicherung als Basis messbarer Effektivität
B. Bokhof, W. Heindel, S. Weigel
Der Onkologe Ausgabe 9/2017; doi: 10.1007/s00761-017-0261-3