Digital mammography screening: sensitivity of the programme dependent on breast density
S. Weigel, W. Heindel, J. Heidrich, H.W. Hense, O. Heidinger
European Radiology, July 2017, Volume 27, Issue 7, pp 2744–2751 doi: 10.1007/s00330-016-4636-4
Digital Mammography Screening: Does Age Influence the Detection Rates of Low-, Intermediate-, and High-Grade Ductal Carcinoma in Situ?
S. Weigel, H. W. Hense, J. Heidrich, S. Berkemeyer, W. Heindel, O. Heidinger
Radiology, 2016 Mar;278:707–713. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2015150322
Reduction of Advanced Breast Cancer Stages at Subsequent Participation in Mammography Screening
S. Weigel, W. Heindel, J. Heidrich, O. Heidinger, H. W. Hense
Rofo. 2015; doi: 10.1055/s-0041-107835
Digital Mammography Screening with Photon-counting Technique: Can a High Diagnostic Performance Be Realized at Low Mean Glandular Dose?
S. Weigel, S. Berkemeyer, R. Girnus, A. Sommer, H. Lenzen, W. Heindel
Radiology. 2014 May;271(2):345-55. doi: 10.1148/radiol.13131181. Epub 2014 Feb 4.
Guideline for Determining the Mean Glandular Dose According to DIN 6868-162 and Threshold Contrast Visibility According to the Quality Assurance Guideline for Digital Mammography Systems
A. Sommer, S. Schopphoven, I. Land, D. Blaser, T. Sobczak
Rofo. 2014 May;186(5):474-81. doi: 10.1055/s-0033-1356284. Epub 2014 Feb 20.